fuel economy 101
-
- Non Member
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:26 am
- Location: Essex
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
fuel economy 101
firstly I am sure many of owner doen't know what is the NSU ?
The rotary engines cones long long way since they invented the Wankel is just one subgroup.
The biggest problem is with fuel system.
as far I know no direct injection ever used. no pizo injectors, no layer inj, no lean inj cycle and no so many other things.
What I am thinking is cycling injectors on cruise when we don't need them. in easier way we can eliminated 2 shot from each rotor or better to say
just have 1 out 3 bangs.
nothing gonna happen since the dynamic compression ratio of this engines is sh*t and every engine works like a pump.
this idea used by GM on Northstar engine series and even in 80s some engines. For GM the idea was to cooling engine when they dont have ignition to cooling engine and making it running even with of water. "Northstar limp home mode"
any idea ?
The rotary engines cones long long way since they invented the Wankel is just one subgroup.
The biggest problem is with fuel system.
as far I know no direct injection ever used. no pizo injectors, no layer inj, no lean inj cycle and no so many other things.
What I am thinking is cycling injectors on cruise when we don't need them. in easier way we can eliminated 2 shot from each rotor or better to say
just have 1 out 3 bangs.
nothing gonna happen since the dynamic compression ratio of this engines is sh*t and every engine works like a pump.
this idea used by GM on Northstar engine series and even in 80s some engines. For GM the idea was to cooling engine when they dont have ignition to cooling engine and making it running even with of water. "Northstar limp home mode"
any idea ?
-
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 9177
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2017 4:56 pm
- RX-8: Turbo
- Colour: Nordic Green
- Location: cornwall
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 550 times
Re: fuel economy 101
come again, but in english?
- These users thanked the author qwakers for the post (total 2):
- njkmr (Mon Jul 22, 2019 7:51 pm) • GreySilver Beast (Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:11 pm)
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 13233
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:30 am
- Location: Cork Ireland
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
Re: fuel economy 101
R3 GONE, FUN WHILE I HAD HER BUT NOW LOVING MY 25TH ANNIVERSARY MX5
Mods so far..
BBR 200 PACKAGE
COBRA " RACE " BACK BOX
MEISTER COILOVERS
KONIG HYPERGRAMS ( POLISHED LIP)
RACING BEAT ARB's ( FRONT AND REAR )
IL MOTORSPORTS STRUT BRACE AND ADJUSTABLE
DROPLINKS
Mods planned..
BBR STAGE 2 SUPERCHARGED
WILWOOD 6 POT BBK
FULL UNDRBODY SEAL
ATOTO HEAD UNIT
Mods so far..
BBR 200 PACKAGE
COBRA " RACE " BACK BOX
MEISTER COILOVERS
KONIG HYPERGRAMS ( POLISHED LIP)
RACING BEAT ARB's ( FRONT AND REAR )
IL MOTORSPORTS STRUT BRACE AND ADJUSTABLE
DROPLINKS
Mods planned..
BBR STAGE 2 SUPERCHARGED
WILWOOD 6 POT BBK
FULL UNDRBODY SEAL
ATOTO HEAD UNIT
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
what you're proposing is interesting as essentially you're saying to go for a cylinder / rotor shutdown in between the normal firing?
i'd agree that this could work and yes this engine is crying out for direct injection but that tech was only in its infancy when the renesis was produced
plasma ignition I feel ( a la lean burn F1 / WEC engines) would also work well due to the long combustion chamber shape and the distance the flame front has to travel - bosch do now in fact sell a plasma plug via their aftermarket division
you would need a very adaptable aftermarket ECU to carry this out though and probably some code support from the ECU manufacture to develop the strategy
potentially you could use a tweaked piggy back unit to cut every other cycle and so leave the Mazda / Denso ECU in place but its quite likley this approach would just set a misfire code
and what about NSU? their engine was hardly a blinding success - the warrenty claims crippled them and led to them being bought by audi
i'd agree that this could work and yes this engine is crying out for direct injection but that tech was only in its infancy when the renesis was produced
plasma ignition I feel ( a la lean burn F1 / WEC engines) would also work well due to the long combustion chamber shape and the distance the flame front has to travel - bosch do now in fact sell a plasma plug via their aftermarket division
you would need a very adaptable aftermarket ECU to carry this out though and probably some code support from the ECU manufacture to develop the strategy
potentially you could use a tweaked piggy back unit to cut every other cycle and so leave the Mazda / Denso ECU in place but its quite likley this approach would just set a misfire code
and what about NSU? their engine was hardly a blinding success - the warrenty claims crippled them and led to them being bought by audi
Last edited by 350matt on Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Spin Doctor
- Posts: 32600
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:56 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Lightning Yellow
- Location: Groomsport, Co Down, NI
- Has thanked: 442 times
- Been thanked: 2089 times
Re: fuel economy 101
I used to drive & maintain an Ro80 and the first sentence lost me...
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G800F using Tapatalk
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
how was it Dave? did the engine compare favourably to Mazda's work?
Always thought the Ro80 was a cool car
Always thought the Ro80 was a cool car
-
- Non Member
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:26 am
- Location: Essex
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: fuel economy 101
lest say we have an engine with 2 cylinder which fire 3 times in each revolution, so we have 6 bangs in each revolution.
What is say is to cut the half of this bangs ! or even 1/3 them.
thing like thats the engine over 5000 RMP losing half of unnecessary bang/fuel/ power.
very English like shouting down a V12 engine to 4 or 6 line.
-
- Non Member
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:26 am
- Location: Essex
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- Non Member
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:26 am
- Location: Essex
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: fuel economy 101
There are lots of potential350matt wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2019 7:45 pmwhat you're proposing is interesting as essentially you're saying to go for a cylinder / rotor shutdown in between the normal firing?
i'd agree that this could work and yes this engine is crying out for direct injection but that tech was only in its infancy when the renesis was produced
plasma ignition I feel ( a la lean burn F1 / WEC engines) would also work well due to the long combustion chamber shape and the distance the flame front has to travel - bosch do now in fact sell a plasma plug via their aftermarket division
you would need a very adaptable aftermarket ECU to carry this out though and probably some code support from the ECU manufacture to develop the strategy
potentially you could use a tweaked piggy back unit to cut every other cycle and so leave the Mazda / Denso ECU in place but its quite likley this approach would just set a misfire code
and what about NSU? their engine was hardly a blinding success - the warrenty claims crippled them and led to them being bought by audi
I am sure standalone ECU can handle it lets say MS3 or force sr8 they can run bmw vanos easily .
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
Oh yes the ECU hardware is more than capable but you need the manufacturer to offer the missing cycle operation as part of the code
this will be difficult as 95% of ECU manufacturer's won't produce custom code - this is however on the cusp of changing with a couple of ECU manufacturer's changing the platform so the end used can produce their own code
personally I'd go for a turbulant jet injection system as this offers the most potential I feel
https://www.mahle-powertrain.com/en/exp ... -ignition/
so are you going to engineer something different and let us know how it all goes?
this will be difficult as 95% of ECU manufacturer's won't produce custom code - this is however on the cusp of changing with a couple of ECU manufacturer's changing the platform so the end used can produce their own code
personally I'd go for a turbulant jet injection system as this offers the most potential I feel
https://www.mahle-powertrain.com/en/exp ... -ignition/
so are you going to engineer something different and let us know how it all goes?
- These users thanked the author 350matt for the post:
- Dentist (Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:31 pm)
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 17234
- Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:12 pm
- RX-8: Kuro
- Colour: Kuro Black
- Location: oswestry shropshire
- Has thanked: 219 times
- Been thanked: 350 times
Re: fuel economy 101
no,he is 2 in a million, i had an nsu quickly moped.
- These users thanked the author goodeggbob for the post:
- Dentist (Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:30 pm)
Rob
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:38 pm
- RX-8: R3
- Colour: Sparkling Black
- Location: Colchester, Essex
- Has thanked: 694 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: fuel economy 101
I often drive modern V8s that limit combustion to 4 cylinders when cruising (the Dodge Challenger for example). The idea being that you don't need all that power at steady motorway speeds and it saves fuel.
Personally I don't like it. You can always tell when those cylinders are turned off and even the tiniest of delay in 'waking' the car back into full power is irritating.
And that's on modern cars with ECUs designed to change the combustion rate in a fraction of a second and a smart set of triggers to activate/deactivate. You wouldn't want to drive one of those V8s (or an RX8) in some sort of economy mode for long if it required a manual switch/or getting the laptop out. Is there any kind of compatible aftermarket ECU available that could intelligently cut combustion on-the-fly based on throttle input, just like modern V8s?
It's an interesting idea but only really useful for RX8s that are regularly driven on long motorway journeys with little or no traffic. Which won't be many in this country.
Personally I don't like it. You can always tell when those cylinders are turned off and even the tiniest of delay in 'waking' the car back into full power is irritating.
And that's on modern cars with ECUs designed to change the combustion rate in a fraction of a second and a smart set of triggers to activate/deactivate. You wouldn't want to drive one of those V8s (or an RX8) in some sort of economy mode for long if it required a manual switch/or getting the laptop out. Is there any kind of compatible aftermarket ECU available that could intelligently cut combustion on-the-fly based on throttle input, just like modern V8s?
It's an interesting idea but only really useful for RX8s that are regularly driven on long motorway journeys with little or no traffic. Which won't be many in this country.
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
I'd say the Bosch Motorspoort ECU or a Cosworth MQ21Di could do this I'd try running as a portion of the load map based on throttle position and road speed so for a light load / throttle angle at say 60mph to 80mph you run in the partial cycle and outside of this range it runs normally
bear in mind that these ECU's both retail at about £6000
bear in mind that these ECU's both retail at about £6000
-
- Spin Doctor
- Posts: 32600
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:56 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Lightning Yellow
- Location: Groomsport, Co Down, NI
- Has thanked: 442 times
- Been thanked: 2089 times
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
So enough for a week then?
- These users thanked the author 350matt for the post:
- geofftl1000r (Tue Oct 15, 2019 9:23 am)
-
- Committee Member
- Posts: 5323
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:40 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Custom
- Location: Cider Country
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: fuel economy 101
Club Treasurer
Kentaro The Red - Sadly fallen...
Star Platinum - Work in progress
For whats pending... See here: viewtopic.php?f=204&t=86071
Kentaro The Red - Sadly fallen...
Star Platinum - Work in progress
For whats pending... See here: viewtopic.php?f=204&t=86071
-
- Former Member
- Posts: 4726
- Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:14 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Velocity Red
- Location: Leicestershire
- Has thanked: 265 times
- Been thanked: 359 times
Re: fuel economy 101
Keep in mind that cylinder deactivation in piston engines has the capability to control intake and exhaust valves to reduce pumping losses.
With our ports being fixed gaping holes with nothing that you can really do about it... yeah.
With our ports being fixed gaping holes with nothing that you can really do about it... yeah.
- These users thanked the author 13Black for the post:
- PeteH (Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:05 pm)
-= Rotormelon Money Pit Build of Tasteless Questionable Bodgery =-
Experimelon 183whp rebuild | Rotary Revs D585s | PZ Suspension | Hawk & Yellowstuff pads | Extra steering lock | Custom exhaust | Added rearward flames of glory | Unnecessarily repurposed ball gags-= Clicky click for build thread =-
-
- Former Member
- Posts: 5849
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:26 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Custom
- Location: West Sussex
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: fuel economy 101
Thinking about the physics. You can shut down a bank of a v8, and that bank will do nothing. It won't generate any heat*, and it won't interfere with the running bank. With a rotary you could probably do something similar by shutting down a rotor, but if you do that you have to think about the lubrication. Can you switch off the injectors? Would you want to? If you kept them going would you end up with liquid oil sloshing around that rotor? And to do rotor cut successfully you'd probably want to siamese the intake and exhaust, to have proper control, which sounds complex and expensive.
Alternatively, you could cut individual chambers, but I think that's a really bad idea, because all 3 chambers are linked. Fuel will end up where you don't want it, and the mixture, exhaust gasses etc will all start to mix in ways that could get nasty. Sometimes chambers will fire very lean, or very rich, and you are likely to send neat petrol to the cat.
Personally, I can see huge problems with any kind of rotor / chamber cut.
There's also a common mis-conception with cylinder cut that you "double" your economy (or some other big number). You don't. You marginally improve economy by marginally improving the overall efficiency. When you cut half the cylinders the other half have to work nearly twice as hard. Are we sure that a rotary with rotor / chamber cutting will actually be more efficient? I can't see much reason why it would be.
* If the cut cylinders continue to compress the air then you generate heat, and lose power, and expend fuel. You can stop this on a piston engine by holding the exhaust valve open. You obviously can't "hold the exhaust valve open" on a rotary, so you are forced to waste heat by pumping compressed gas.
Alternatively, you could cut individual chambers, but I think that's a really bad idea, because all 3 chambers are linked. Fuel will end up where you don't want it, and the mixture, exhaust gasses etc will all start to mix in ways that could get nasty. Sometimes chambers will fire very lean, or very rich, and you are likely to send neat petrol to the cat.
Personally, I can see huge problems with any kind of rotor / chamber cut.
There's also a common mis-conception with cylinder cut that you "double" your economy (or some other big number). You don't. You marginally improve economy by marginally improving the overall efficiency. When you cut half the cylinders the other half have to work nearly twice as hard. Are we sure that a rotary with rotor / chamber cutting will actually be more efficient? I can't see much reason why it would be.
* If the cut cylinders continue to compress the air then you generate heat, and lose power, and expend fuel. You can stop this on a piston engine by holding the exhaust valve open. You obviously can't "hold the exhaust valve open" on a rotary, so you are forced to waste heat by pumping compressed gas.
-
- Former Member
- Posts: 5849
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:26 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Custom
- Location: West Sussex
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: fuel economy 101
Mr. Black, do you know how annoying it is to write an essay then, when you press send, find that someone else has written it in two sentences already?
-
- Spin Doctor
- Posts: 9429
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:49 am
- RX-8: Kuro
- Colour: Sparkling Black
- Location: Cotswolds
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Re: fuel economy 101
The PCM already does cut one cylinder rotor during very light loads if the throttle is not closed. You can hear it if you listen carefully, it causes a burbly tone just at the cusp of deceleration and if you further release the throttle it eventually cuts both rotors (all when ECT has reached normal levels).
- These users thanked the author Phil Bate for the post (total 2):
- 350matt (Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:19 pm) • Paul_13 (Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:21 am)
Phil's subtle sunlight silver - stronger, faster, with added red bits and stuff engine donor!
Operation Mint - Kuro preservation project
The pimped out Glacier White XE - quintessential British motoring from Jaguar
Operation Mint - Kuro preservation project
The pimped out Glacier White XE - quintessential British motoring from Jaguar
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3180
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 9:09 pm
- RX-8: 231
- Colour: Strato Blue
- Location: Northants
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 332 times
Re: fuel economy 101
you do still get a an economy gain by cutting cylinders without the ability to deactivate inlet or exhaust valves
its not as much as you might think due to the reasons 13Black and Pete have already stated but from memory its about a 5-6% improvement to shut half the cylinders down and you can then make this rise to about 10-12% if you can shut both inlet and exhaust valves to stop any pumping losses
and its interesting that there already is already a rotor cutout facility in the Mazda ECU ( thanks Phil)
is this aspect open to adjustment in Mazda edit?
its not as much as you might think due to the reasons 13Black and Pete have already stated but from memory its about a 5-6% improvement to shut half the cylinders down and you can then make this rise to about 10-12% if you can shut both inlet and exhaust valves to stop any pumping losses
and its interesting that there already is already a rotor cutout facility in the Mazda ECU ( thanks Phil)
is this aspect open to adjustment in Mazda edit?
-
- Committee Member
- Posts: 8171
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:30 pm
- RX-8: R3
- Colour: Velocity Red
- Location: Cotswolds
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 548 times
Re: fuel economy 101
I think Mr Dentist is probably doing this community a disservice by talking down to everyone with the opening line "I bet none of you lot have heard of the NSU Wankel engine"...
But either way. Cylinder deactivation (I know it isn't cylinder, but it's an easier term to use) *might* improve economy, but for the amount of good it would do I wouldn't see it as being worth the hassle and risk to the engine internals.
Perhaps Mazda will do something similar with their latest engine, which also uses compression charge ignition, to boost - as an OEM with a large amount of R&D budget could justify thousands of pounds for an additional 1mpg or a 5% reduction in emissions.
It's also worth noting that engines that benefit from Cylinder Deactivation are usually larger engines which have an impressive amount of torque - such that the engine itself can continue at cruising speed, or mild acceleration, without too much fuss. At the kinds of RPM and loads that cylinder deactivation would be beneficial the torque produced by a rotary (Renesis at least) would be relatively small and thus minimise any fuel economy gains available.
Obviously just my opinion, but it's not massively feasible I don't think :/
But either way. Cylinder deactivation (I know it isn't cylinder, but it's an easier term to use) *might* improve economy, but for the amount of good it would do I wouldn't see it as being worth the hassle and risk to the engine internals.
Perhaps Mazda will do something similar with their latest engine, which also uses compression charge ignition, to boost - as an OEM with a large amount of R&D budget could justify thousands of pounds for an additional 1mpg or a 5% reduction in emissions.
It's also worth noting that engines that benefit from Cylinder Deactivation are usually larger engines which have an impressive amount of torque - such that the engine itself can continue at cruising speed, or mild acceleration, without too much fuss. At the kinds of RPM and loads that cylinder deactivation would be beneficial the torque produced by a rotary (Renesis at least) would be relatively small and thus minimise any fuel economy gains available.
Obviously just my opinion, but it's not massively feasible I don't think :/
DOC 787B
Club Information Coordinator - Media Team Lead
LM30 VelociBRAPTOR - Josh Scott magic sauce porting, shiny big brakes and a big ole spoiler
Doc's Auto Barn - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7BW_h ... Ym6eGqEIWg
Club Information Coordinator - Media Team Lead
LM30 VelociBRAPTOR - Josh Scott magic sauce porting, shiny big brakes and a big ole spoiler
Doc's Auto Barn - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7BW_h ... Ym6eGqEIWg
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 1:49 am
- RX-8: Import
- Colour: Black Cherry
- Location: Peterborough
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: fuel economy 101
...or just go single rotor turbo.
Just the one rotor's worth of fuel at all times, just more being sucked through when you need it. Simples
This could be why all major car makers are making smaller engines with turbos........
Just the one rotor's worth of fuel at all times, just more being sucked through when you need it. Simples
This could be why all major car makers are making smaller engines with turbos........
Black Cherry Mica
JDM Evolve. 192 6 spd manual from auto
I can explain it, but I can't understand it for you.
JDM Evolve. 192 6 spd manual from auto
I can explain it, but I can't understand it for you.
-
- Club Member
- Posts: 13233
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:30 am
- Location: Cork Ireland
- Has thanked: 147 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
Re: fuel economy 101
It always puts a smile on my face when I see those two words in the same sentence.
Fact is rotaries are and never will be in any way shape or form economical.
Fact is rotaries are and never will be in any way shape or form economical.
R3 GONE, FUN WHILE I HAD HER BUT NOW LOVING MY 25TH ANNIVERSARY MX5
Mods so far..
BBR 200 PACKAGE
COBRA " RACE " BACK BOX
MEISTER COILOVERS
KONIG HYPERGRAMS ( POLISHED LIP)
RACING BEAT ARB's ( FRONT AND REAR )
IL MOTORSPORTS STRUT BRACE AND ADJUSTABLE
DROPLINKS
Mods planned..
BBR STAGE 2 SUPERCHARGED
WILWOOD 6 POT BBK
FULL UNDRBODY SEAL
ATOTO HEAD UNIT
Mods so far..
BBR 200 PACKAGE
COBRA " RACE " BACK BOX
MEISTER COILOVERS
KONIG HYPERGRAMS ( POLISHED LIP)
RACING BEAT ARB's ( FRONT AND REAR )
IL MOTORSPORTS STRUT BRACE AND ADJUSTABLE
DROPLINKS
Mods planned..
BBR STAGE 2 SUPERCHARGED
WILWOOD 6 POT BBK
FULL UNDRBODY SEAL
ATOTO HEAD UNIT